If you read my previous post, I told you about I Write Like, a site that analyzes your writing samples and compares your writing to that of well-known authors. A few people have asked me some questions, so allow me to go into a little more detail.
At the very least, the site is not just a random rotation of authors. The same writing samples will get the same results. I've tested this time and again.
Also, I think that there may be something to whatever algorithms they use. When I post writing samples that are similar in content (e.g. passive or descriptive parts), I get different authors then when I post action or dialogue sequences. By the same token, when I posted a short story about monsters from another dimension, I got Lovecraft.
I get Stephen King more than any other writer, and this stands to reason. Not from a success or skill standpoint (yet *wink*), but from a style one. He's my favorite author, and the one I've read most by far, so incorporating a lot of his style into my own is almost expected.
Lastly, as a goof, I posted the first line from King's The Dark Tower, saga, and got King. I grabbed a sample from Twilight, as well, and got Stephenie Meyer. Same for Fight Club.
The more I think about it, the more I think that there's at least some degree of accuracy, although your mileage may vary. In some cases, you may not like with whom your writing compares, so be prepared for the horror. :-)
Dan
Thanks for this! I was skeptical of this widget, so I appreciate hearing about your studies.
ReplyDeleteI put in several excerpts and got a different author each time. I even got different authors for excerpts from the same work.
This doesn't entirely surprise me, because I write in a variety of styles and genres and can consciously tell myself to write in a different voice. But still - I wasn't getting a trend.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteWelcome to my humblest of blogs. :-)
ReplyDeleteI got some of the same results you did
(multiple authors from the same work, for
one), but for decidedly different passages.
Generally speaking, I thought it was fairly
accurate, at least with authors whose work
I'm familiar with.
Still, a fun distraction. And apparently a
conversation starter, too!Welcome to my humblest of blogs. :-)
I got some of the same results you did
(multiple authors from the same work, for
one), but for decidedly different passages.
Generally speaking, I thought it was fairly
accurate, at least with authors whose work
I'm familiar with.
Still, a fun distraction. And apparently a
conversation starter, too!
This keeps double posting!
ReplyDelete